Nævnet stadfæstede i december 2019 Udlændingestyrelsens afgørelse vedrørende en kvindelig statsborger fra DR Congo. Indrejst i 2007. Sambehandlet med demo/2020/7/DH demo/2020/8/DHFlygtningenævnet udtalte: ”Udlændingestyrelsen meddelte den [dato i sommeren] 2007 klageren opholdstilladelse efter ud-lændingelovens 8, stk. 1, jf. § 7, stk. 1. Klageren har til UNHCR oplyst, at hun og hendes ægtefælle i 1998 blev opsøgt på deres bopæl i DR Congo. Klageren og hendes ægtefælle blev bortført af en gruppe oprørere. Under bortførelsen blev klageren voldtaget af en af oprørerne, men det lykkedes efterfølgende for klageren og hendes ægtefælle at flygte fra oprørerne. Klageren oplyste videre, at familiens bopæl i [måned i sommeren] 2005 blev angrebet af soldater, som krævede penge. Solda-terne skød og dræbte klagerens svoger, udsatte klageren og hendes familie for overgreb og bortførte klagerens døtre, [B] og [A]. [B] blev voldtaget og skåret i halsen med en kniv. [A] blev holdt fanget og tvunget til at indgå ægteskab med en kommandant. Det lykkedes klagerens døtre at flygte, hvor-efter klageren og hendes familie flygtede til Uganda i frygt for, at soldaterne ville opsøge dem igen. Den [dato i efteråret] 2015 modtog Udlændingestyrelsen en henvendelse fra klagerens datter, [A], hvori [A] oplyste, at hun var begyndt at leve et kristent liv, og at hun er blevet klar over, at hun kan ende i helvede på grund af den løgn, hun fortalte i flygtningelejren i Uganda. [A] oplyste, at hun havde løjet om, at hun var blevet voldtaget af nogle soldater. Til klagerens samtale med Udlændin-gestyrelsen den [dato i sommeren] 2018 oplyste hun, at klageren og hendes veninde i 1998 blev opsøgt af soldater fra Rwanda på klagerens venindes bopæl. I den forbindelse blev klageren voldta-get af en soldat. Klageren oplyste videre, at hændelsen i 2005 ikke havde fundet sted, og at de hav-de forladt DR Congo på grund af den generelle sikkerhedssituation i landet. Udlændingestyrelsen traf [ultimo] 2018 afgørelse om at inddrage klagerens opholdstilladelse, idet klageren havde opnået opholdstilladelse ved svig, jf. udlændingelovens 19, stk. 2, nr. 1. Flygtningenævnet henholder sig indledningsvis til sin vurdering af [dato i foråret] 2019, hvorefter betingelserne for at inddrage kla-gerens opholdstil¬ladelse i medfør af udlændingelovens § 19, stk. 2, nr. 1, isoleret set er opfyldt, og hvorefter inddragelse af klagerens opholdstilladelse ikke må antages at virke særligt belastende for klageren, jf. udlændingelovens § 26, stk. 1, jf. den dagældende § 19, stk. 7, 1. pkt., i udlændingelo-ven, ligesom hverken hensynet til familiens enhed eller klagerens helbredsmæssige forhold kan føre til en anden vurdering. Af United Nations Security Council, Implementation of the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework for the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Region, fra 1. ok-tober 2019, fremgår blandt andet: “II. Major developments A. Security situation 2. During the period under review, the security situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo remained frag-ile, as illegal armed groups continued to commit atrocities against the civilian population and attack the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC). In addition, cross-border security-related incidents, prevailing insecurity in the Central African Republic and sporadic fighting between Government and opposition forces in South Sudan affected peace and stability in the Great Lakes region. 3. In the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) were suspected of per-petrating attacks in the Beni area, including in areas affected by the outbreak of the Ebola virus disease. Fur-thermore, alleged links between ADF and Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) raised grave concern in the region. On 18 April, ISIL claimed responsibility for an attack suspected to have been carried out by ADF on an FARDC camp in Bovata, North Kivu, on 16 April, during which two soldiers and one civilian were killed. Since then, ISIL has claimed responsibility for more attacks also attributed to ADF. In a media appearance on 29 June, the President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Félix Tshisekedi, expressed concern over the adoption by ADF of terror tactics linked to ISIL. In its most recent report, however, the Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo did not confirm any direct link between ADF and ISIL. 4. FARDC and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) continued joint military operations against ADF, including an offensive on 30 May that led to the killing of 26 ADF combatants in Ngite, North Kivu. 5. The operational strength of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) continued to dimin-ish during the period under review, following the repatriation of most of its former combatants from camps in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2018, along with sustained joint FARDC-MONUSCO operations targeting the group. The impact of the death of the FDLR leader, Ignace Murwanashyaka, in Germany on 16 April was not immediately discernible in the operational structure and morale of the rebel group. FDLR remained active and continued to pose a threat in North and South Kivu Provinces through local and regional networks. The number of cases of conflict-related sexual violence reportedly committed by FDLR combatants increased in Nyiragongo territory, where most victims were attacked on their way to collect firewood and charcoal in the Virunga National Park. Conflict-related sexual violence also continues to be reported in Rutshuru territory, in the context of clashes between FDLR and Nyatura elements. 6. In December 2018, the FDLR splinter group Conseil national pour le renouveau et la démocratie (CNRD) came under significant pressure from the Nduma défense du Congo-Rénové (NDC-R) militia and was forced to move southward. Abandoning their positions in North Kivu, hundreds of CNRD fighters and thousands of Rwandan Hutu civilians travelling with the group relocated to South Kivu in January 2019. Throughout their southbound movement, which began around 23 December 2018, several clashes occurred, with casualties reported within CNRD ranks and among civilians. FARDC and MONUSCO engaged in pursuit of the rebels in South Kivu. There were allegations of conflict-related sexual violence against minors attributed to CNRD, in the context of clashes with FARDC in Kalehe, South Kivu. 7. The P5 coalition, an armed group composed of Rwandan opposition political organizations, has been weak-ened by the arrest on 30 April and extradition from the Comoros of Callixte “Sankara” Nsabimana, the leader of the National Liberation Front, the military wing of the Mouvement rwandais pour le changement démocratique. On 23 May, Callixte Nsabimana was charged with 16 crimes, including terrorism, kidnapping, murder and genocide denial. He pleaded guilty to all charges. Despite those setbacks, members of the P5 coalition, supported by the local Ngomino armed group and remaining members of FDLR, were reported to have regrouped and reorganized in North Kivu and South Kivu. 8. Similarly, although the presence of the Résistance pour un État de droit au Burundi in South Kivu had de-creased following FARDC-MONUSCO military operations in early 2019, the group was reported to have been fighting since May alongside Mai-Mai Yakutumba against the Rwanda National Congress. …”Af UNHCR’s Position on Returns to North Kivu, South Kivu, Ituri, and adjacent areas in the Dem-ocratic Republic of Congo affected by ongoing conflict and violence – Update II, fra september 2019 fremgår blandt andet:“Human Rights Situation13. Serious and frequent violations of human rights continue to be perpetrated by varius actors in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri. ……Humanitarian Situation14. The humanitarian situation in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri remains dire, with much of the population requiring humanitarian assistance but with severe operational challenges for humanitarian actors. …”Selvom de generelle forhold i DR Congo således er alvorlige og uforudsigelige, finder Flygtninge-nævnet, at forholdene ikke er af en sådan karakter, at enhver ved sin blotte tilstedeværelse risikerer behandling i strid med Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 3. Flygtningenæv-net stadfæster derfor Udlændingestyrelsens afgørelse.” demo/2020/9/DH
