Nævnet stadfæstede i december 2019 Udlændingestyrelsens afgørelse vedrørende en kvindelig statsborger fra DR Congo. Indrejst i 2007. Sambehandlet med demo/2020/7/DH demo/2020/9/DHFlygtningenævnet udtalte: ”Udlændingestyrelsen meddelte den [dato i sommeren] 2007 klageren opholdstilladelse efter ud-lændingelovens § 8, stk. 1, jf. § 7, stk. 1. Klageren har til UNHCR oplyst, at hun siden 1998 havde delt bopæl med sin søster, [C], og hendes familie. I [dato i sommeren] 2005 blev deres bopæl opsøgt af nogle mænd i militærtøj, som krævede penge. Mændene skød og dræbte klagerens ægtefælle og bortførte klagerens niecer, [B] og [A], og de slog klagerens søster med en geværkolbe. [B] vendte tilbage til bopælen samme nat med snitsår på halsen. Hun fortalte, at mændene, der havde bortført hende, havde voldtaget hende og forsøgt at slå hende ihjel. Da det også lykkedes [A] at flygte, flygtede klageren og resten af hendes familie sammen til Uganda. Den 2. november 2015 modtog Udlændingestyrelsen en henvendelse fra klagerens niece, [A], hvori [A] oplyste, at hun var begyndt at leve et kristent liv, og at hun er blevet klar over, at hun kan ende i helvede på grund af den løgn, hun fortalte i flygtningelejren i Uganda. [A] oplyste, at hun havde løjet om, at hun var blevet vold-taget af nogle soldater. Til klagerens samtaler med Udlændingestyrelsen den [dato i sommeren] 2018 og den [dato i efteråret] 2018 oplyste hun, at det asylmotiv hun havde oplyst til UNHCR var usandt. Klageren oplyste, at hendes ægtefælle ikke var blevet skudt og slået ihjel under episoden i [måned i sommeren] 2005, og at klagerens niecer ikke var blevet bortført og voldtaget. Klageren oplyste videre til sine samtaler med Udlændingestyrelsen i 2018, at hun havde reelle konflikter i sit hjemland, som hun ikke havde fortalt om til UNHCR. Klageren oplyste, at hun rettelig frygtede rwandiske soldater som følge af klagerens politiske aktiviteter. Klageren har til støtte herfor oplyst, at hun har arbejdet for oppositionspartiet Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie (RCD). Klageren har oplyst, at hendes taske indeholdende hendes pung og ID-kort med navn, adresse og telefonnummer, blev stjålet. Klageren frygtede, at hendes taske med hendes personlige oplysninger var kommet i de rwandiske soldaters besiddelse. Klageren levede efterfølgende i skjul frem til sin udrejse af DR Congo [ultimo] 2005. Udlændingestyrelsen traf den [dato i efteråret] afgørelse om at inddrage klagerens opholdstilladelse, idet klageren havde opnået opholdstilladelse ved svig, jf. ud-lændingelovens 19, stk. 2, nr. 1. Flygtningenævnet henholder sig indledningsvis til sin vurdering af [dato i foråret] 2019, hvorefter betingelserne for at inddrage klagerens opholdstil¬ladelse i medfør af udlændingelovens § 19, stk. 2, nr. 1, isoleret set er opfyldt, og hvorefter inddragelse af klagerens opholdstilladelse ikke må antages at virke særligt belastende for klageren, jf. udlændingelovens § 26, stk. 1, jf. den dagældende § 19, stk. 7, 1. pkt., i udlændingeloven, ligesom hverken hensynet til familiens enhed eller klagerens helbredsmæssige forhold kan føre til en anden vurdering. Af United Nations Security Council, Implementation of the Peace, Security and Cooperation Framework for the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Region, fra 1. oktober 2019, fremgår blandt andet: “II. Major developments A. Security situation 2. During the period under review, the security situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo remained fragile, as illegal armed groups continued to commit atrocities against the civilian population and attack the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC). In addition, cross-border security-related incidents, prevailing insecurity in the Central African Republic and sporadic fighting between Government and opposition forces in South Sudan af-fected peace and stability in the Great Lakes region. 3. In the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) were suspected of perpetrating attacks in the Beni area, including in areas affected by the outbreak of the Ebola virus disease. Furthermore, alleged links between ADF and Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) raised grave concern in the region. On 18 April, ISIL claimed responsibility for an attack suspected to have been carried out by ADF on an FARDC camp in Bovata, North Kivu, on 16 April, during which two soldiers and one civilian were killed. Since then, ISIL has claimed responsibility for more attacks also attributed to ADF. In a media appearance on 29 June, the President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Félix Tshisekedi, expressed concern over the adoption by ADF of terror tactics linked to ISIL. In its most recent report, however, the Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo did not confirm any direct link between ADF and ISIL. 4. FARDC and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) continued joint military operations against ADF, including an offensive on 30 May that led to the killing of 26 ADF combatants in Ngite, North Kivu. 5. The operational strength of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) continued to diminish dur-ing the period under review, following the repatriation of most of its former combatants from camps in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2018, along with sustained joint FARDC-MONUSCO operations targeting the group. The impact of the death of the FDLR leader, Ignace Murwanashyaka, in Germany on 16 April was not immedi-ately discernible in the operational structure and morale of the rebel group. FDLR remained active and continued to pose a threat in North and South Kivu Provinces through local and regional networks. The number of cases of conflict-related sexual violence reportedly committed by FDLR combatants increased in Nyiragongo territory, where most vic-tims were attacked on their way to collect firewood and charcoal in the Virunga National Park. Conflict-related sexual violence also continues to be reported in Rutshuru territory, in the context of clashes between FDLR and Nyatura ele-ments. 6. In December 2018, the FDLR splinter group Conseil national pour le renouveau et la démocratie (CNRD) came un-der significant pressure from the Nduma défense du Congo-Rénové (NDC-R) militia and was forced to move south-ward. Abandoning their positions in North Kivu, hundreds of CNRD fighters and thousands of Rwandan Hutu civilians travelling with the group relocated to South Kivu in January 2019. Throughout their southbound movement, which began around 23 December 2018, several clashes occurred, with casualties reported within CNRD ranks and among civilians. FARDC and MONUSCO engaged in pursuit of the rebels in South Kivu. There were allegations of conflict-related sexual violence against minors attributed to CNRD, in the context of clashes with FARDC in Kalehe, South Kivu. 7. The P5 coalition, an armed group composed of Rwandan opposition political organizations, has been weakened by the arrest on 30 April and extradition from the Comoros of Callixte “Sankara” Nsabimana, the leader of the National Liberation Front, the military wing of the Mouvement rwandais pour le changement démocratique. On 23 May, Callixte Nsabimana was charged with 16 crimes, including terrorism, kidnapping, murder and genocide denial. He pleaded guilty to all charges. Despite those setbacks, members of the P5 coalition, supported by the local Ngomino armed group and remaining members of FDLR, were reported to have regrouped and reorganized in North Kivu and South Kivu. 8. Similarly, although the presence of the Résistance pour un État de droit au Burundi in South Kivu had decreased following FARDC-MONUSCO military operations in early 2019, the group was reported to have been fighting since May alongside Mai-Mai Yakutumba against the Rwanda National Congress. …”Af UNHCR’s Position on Returns to North Kivu, South Kivu, Ituri, and adjacent areas in the Dem-ocratic Republic of Congo affected by ongoing conflict and violence – Update II, fra september 2019 fremgår blandt andet:“Human Rights Situation13. Serious and frequent violations of human rights continue to be perpetrated by varius actors in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri. ……Humanitarian Situation14. The humanitarian situation in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri remains dire, with much of the population requiring humanitarian assistance but with severe operational challenges for humanitarian actors. …”Selvom de generelle forhold i DR Congo således er alvorlige og uforudsigelige, finder Flygtninge-nævnet, at forholdene ikke er af en sådan karakter, at enhver ved sin blotte tilstedeværelse risikerer behandling i strid med Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 3. Flygtningenæv-net stadfæster derfor Udlændingestyrelsens afgørelse.” demo/2020/8/DH
